01 / RESEARCH GUIDEThe short answer
Finding a company report is only the first part of source work. You also need to establish the issuer, document type, reporting period and whether a later amendment or update matters to the question. A small, maintained source register makes repeated company research more reliable than a folder of files with unclear origins.
02 / RESEARCH GUIDEConfirm the reporting entity
Begin with the issuer's official website and the relevant regulator or exchange disclosure route. Match the name and identifiers to the company you intend to research. A familiar brand can operate through subsidiaries, while a listed parent may report a broader group. Do not assume a document belongs to the desired entity because the logo looks familiar. Record the source page, report title, publication or filing date and covered period. Keep the original link whenever possible so another reader can verify that the document came from an appropriate source.
03 / RESEARCH GUIDEChoose the document for the question
An annual report, interim report, earnings release, presentation and current-event filing can contain different levels of detail. Select the document that supports the particular fact you need and read the surrounding explanation. For US issuers, SEC resources explain how periodic and current filings can be used in research. Other jurisdictions have different forms and reporting systems, so do not mechanically apply US labels everywhere. A company presentation may summarize a result attractively while the detailed report contains definitions, risks and accounting notes needed to interpret it.
04 / RESEARCH GUIDECheck sequence and amendments
Compare the document date with the reference period and inspect whether a later filing, amendment or restatement affects your chosen information. Preserve the version used rather than silently replacing an old value in a historical note. If the research asks what was known at a past date, use documents available at that time and label later context separately. A current webpage can link the newest report while an older study requires an earlier version. Keeping sequence information prevents a reader from assuming that today's corrected or expanded disclosure was available when the original observation was made.
05 / RESEARCH GUIDEBuild a reusable register
Create a row for each important source with issuer, document type, period, date, URL, relevant section and a brief note about its use. Add access or retrieval dates and any unresolved issue. Use descriptive filenames for permitted downloads without treating the local file as the only evidence. The register should help answer where a number came from and why that document was used. Review links periodically and retain only material you are allowed to store. A modest register maintained consistently is more useful than a large archive that cannot connect a statement in the research note to its origin.
06 / RESEARCH GUIDEA practical example
Illustrative search: a researcher needs an annual revenue figure and the explanation for a later financing event. They locate the annual report for the relevant period and a separate current disclosure covering the event. Each source receives its own register entry. The financial table cites the report section, while the event note cites the later document. If an amendment changes a relevant figure, the researcher preserves the original observation and adds an update rather than erasing the sequence. The final note makes clear which evidence supports which statement and avoids treating a single investor presentation as a source for every question.
07 / RESEARCH GUIDEA working record to keep
Use a document register with separate fields for publication date and covered period. Add the regulator or issuer source, document type, version and relevant section. A third date can record when you retrieved it. Link important statements in the research note to this register. If a later amendment appears, create a linked entry and explain which part of the earlier work it affects. Do not rename the new file in a way that hides the version sequence. A consistent register makes it easier to answer whether an observation was supported at the time and whether a current comparison needs to use an updated report, without relying on a browser's changing latest-report link.
08 / RESEARCH GUIDEPreserve the chain of evidence
A company research note should distinguish identity, source, calculation and interpretation. Begin with the issuer and selected instrument. Attach important statements to original documents with dates and relevant sections. Keep your calculations reproducible and label transformations, units and periods. Then explain the interpretation separately, including the most important uncertainty or alternative explanation. This structure helps another reader verify the work without relying on the researcher's memory.
Use platforms to organize and explore information, but check the definitions of fields central to the question. A standardized value may differ from a reported line because of mapping, period, unit or presentation. Investigate the difference rather than assuming that every populated field is comparable. Preserve missing values and unresolved mappings. When the required accounting or instrument issue is beyond the scope of the available evidence, state the limitation and identify the next source or expertise needed.
Maintain a visible timeline. Keep the publication date, covered period and retrieval date where relevant. Add later amendments or new reports as dated updates instead of silently rewriting an earlier observation. Review the note when an event changes the issuer, security or comparison basis. The objective is a bounded research conclusion that remains understandable as evidence changes. Organization improves traceability, but it does not eliminate business uncertainty or turn a completed checklist into a personalized investment recommendation.
09 / RESEARCH GUIDEYour review checklist
- Match the reporting entity and source route before relying on a document with a familiar company name or logo.
- Select annual, interim, current-event or presentation material according to the specific information required.
- Check dates, versions and later amendments and keep historical availability separate from today's updated evidence.
- Maintain a source register with document identity, period, link, relevant section and the reason the source was used.
10 / RESEARCH GUIDEFrequently asked questions.
Should a platform summary replace the original company disclosure?
Use the summary for navigation and context, then check original documents for important definitions and statements. Record which source supports each material observation in the research note.
What should happen when two financial values disagree?
Compare entity, period, currency, units, definitions and versions before deciding what explains the difference. Keep unresolved discrepancies visible and avoid calculations that require an unconfirmed equivalence.
Does completing the process imply a buy or sell conclusion?
No. The process organizes evidence and open questions. The appropriate output may be further investigation, a narrower conclusion or a decision to stop researching the company.
Bring your next question to the workspace.
Explore the developing Finoberg terminal. Check the coverage and source context relevant to your task; features are still evolving.
Open the terminal ↗Continue your research.
Official resources relevant to the definitions and evaluation questions in this guide. Practical worksheets, examples and proposed tests are Finoberg editorial frameworks. Product comparisons are documentation-based, not hands-on benchmarks.
Published 27 October 2026. Product plans, access and terms can change; confirm current details with the provider. Examples labeled illustrative use hypothetical situations. Educational research information, not personalized investment advice. Finoberg is independent of Bloomberg L.P.